conferences.computer.science

All conferences / RC

RC

International Conference on Reversible Computation

Editions listed6 Covered2021–2026 Rank nowCORE C ProceedingsPaywalled Chairs & speakers1 of 23 women, 7 expected

Editions

YearEd.HeldWhere Paper deadlineAcceptedRate
2026 18 9โ€“10 Jul 2026 Turin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น 28 Feb +15 days 17 / 38 45%
2025 17 3โ€“4 Jul 2025 Odense ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ 28 Feb +15 days 12 / 22 55%
2024 16 4โ€“5 Jul 2024 Toruล„ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ 25 Feb +14 days 13 / 18 72%
2023 15 18โ€“19 Jul 2023 Giessen ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช 20 Feb +7 days 14 / 19 74%
2022 14 5โ€“6 Jul 2022 Urbino ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น 28 Feb +7 days 16 / 20 80%
2021 13 7โ€“8 Jul 2021 Nagoya ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 21 Mar +28 days 11 / 21 52%

A missing year does not mean the conference did not meet: coverage before 2021 has not been verified.

Acceptance rate over time

0%30%60%
  1. 2026 45% 17/38
  2. 2025 55% 12/22
  3. 2024 72% 13/18
  4. 2023 74% 14/19
  5. 2022 80% 16/20
  6. 2021 52% 11/21

Scale runs to 60%; the mid-line marks 30%.

Submissions

  1. 2026 38
  2. 2025 22
  3. 2024 18
  4. 2023 19
  5. 2022 20
  6. 2021 21

Scaled to this conference's own busiest year (38), so the shape is comparable across its editions but not between conferences.

Who led each edition

Well below

1 of 23 chairs and invited speakers were women or of another gender, against 7 at this site's own rate of 29%. A shortfall this large would happen by chance less than once in twenty times.

Chairs and invited speakers

  1. all 6 4% of 23
  2. 2026 1 of 4
  3. 2025 0 of 3
  4. 2024 0 of 3
  5. 2023 0 of 4
  6. 2022 0 of 4
  7. 2021 0 of 5

Across 6 editions, 1 of 23 chairs and invited speakers were women or of another gender — 4%. At this site's own rate of 29%, 7 would be the expectation. A shortfall this large would happen by chance less than once in twenty times.

Only editions with counted people appear: an edition recorded as mixed and nothing more has no arithmetic behind it. The total counts people, not years, so an edition with eight chairs weighs more than one with two. The committee is reported beside the platform, never added to it. The rate this is set against, 29%, is pooled from 364 chairs and invited speakers across 82 editions on this site — an observation about the field as recorded here, not a target.

How it has reviewed and published

Practice 212223242526
Proceedings • • • • • •
Anonymity S S S S S S

A blank cell means nobody has checked that year, not that the answer is no. Licences are read as recorded on the edition, never inherited from the publisher.

Spotted something wrong on this page? Tell us, with a source if you have one ↗

Data entirely hand-typed, one call for papers at a time. There is no scraper behind any of this: I read the call for papers and/or the Web sites and type the dates in, in the gaps between other work, and with the hope it is useful to others. Organisers might then move deadlines without telling anyone, which may lead to inconsistencies. So, treat this small page as a well-meaning notebook rather than an authority ๐Ÿค“